Review of the Thesis: an Example With a Sample


A thesis is allowed to be defended only if there are two reviews. In this case, the reviewers are the supervisor and a freelancer. The latter may be an employee of the department or a teacher of another educational institution with a scientific title. It is important that a freelance reviewer from write my papers is in a position that fits your profile. Work in the humanities should be checked by a specialist exclusively in this industry, and not technical.


Naturally, ideally, the review should be written exclusively by the reviewer. But often students are independently involved in the preparation and execution, and the specialist only approves the document. So where should you start? At the very beginning, be sure to indicate the following data:

  • The name of the work with an indication of the subject.

  • Student details.

  • Details of the educational institution.


After this information, you can proceed to the formulation of the content.


Analytical Analysis of Work


In the content of the review, first of all, the relevance of the thesis should be highlighted. The reviewer should note what role research plays and why it is so important today. If you are writing a review yourself, then take the relevance that is indicated in the introduction of the diploma and rephrase it a little.


The main points are described below. What should the specialist who makes the assessment of the work do:

  • Analyze the logic of the proposed study.

  • Draw conclusions from the results, justify them.


Not only the text of the thesis is analyzed, but also the materials that were used for writing, and the student's conclusions. The assessment should also cover technical materials with applications.


The main thing for the student is to write a positive review. It should be the result and say that the topic of the thesis is fully considered, all goals and objectives are fulfilled. But be careful, the review should not consist only of laudatory reviews. It must contain minor criticism and small comments. It is important to skillfully point out the shortcomings, but in the context of the fact that they do not affect the quality of the work and it is quite good. After that, it is important to pay attention to the organizational abilities of the student, his creative approach. Also, do not forget to indicate that all the rules and norms of writing / design were observed.




The review ends with a summary. It indicates the recommended assessment and readiness for protection. So, what points should be reviewed:

  1. Title, student details and research topic.

  2. Analysis of the relevance and each section in a logical sequence.

  3. How well writer handled the topic.

  4. Evaluation of the theoretical and practical component.

  5. Description of the positive and negative characteristics of the study.

  6. Evaluation of the benefits of a diploma.

  7. Resume of the author who evaluates the work.


Each university must make its own adjustments to the design. To ensure that the assessment meets all standards, read the methodological requirements or view review examples. They are usually kept in the pulpit for a long time.
  • 0


  • 0


  • 0

    Melhores Respostas

  • 100


  • Seguidores

    Usuário não tem seguidores ainda
  • Seguindo

    Usuário ainda não segue ninguém